BG
ES
CS
DA
DE
ET
EL
EN
FR
HR
IT
LV
LT
HU
MT
NL
PL
PT
RO
SK
SL
FI
SVInfo
- Referral date: 19-11-2009
- Show case reference
- Opinion date: 09-12-2010
- Ruling date: 31-03-2011
- AG: Bot
References in this case
- C-11/07 - Eckelkamp
- C-182/08 - Glaxo Wellcome
- C-234/01 - Gerritse
- C-25/10 - Heukelbach
- C-279/93 - Schumacker
- C-290/04 - Scorpio
- C-311/08 - SGI
- C-318/07 - Persche
- C-345/04 - Centro Equestre
- C-346/04 - Conijn
- C-35/08 - Busley und Cibrian Fernandez
- C-377/08 - EGN
- C-415/93 - Union royale belge des sociétés de football association and Others v Bosman and Others
- C-43/07 - Arens-Sikken
- C-443/06 - Hollmann
- C-510/08 - Mattner
- C-512/03 - Blanckaert
- C-562/07 - Commission v Spain
- C-97/09 - Schmelz
References to this case
- C-11/07 - Eckelkamp
- C-182/08 - Glaxo Wellcome
- C-234/01 - Gerritse
- C-25/10 - Heukelbach
- C-279/93 - Schumacker
- C-290/04 - Scorpio
- C-311/08 - SGI
- C-318/07 - Persche
- C-345/04 - Centro Equestre
- C-346/04 - Conijn
- C-35/08 - Busley und Cibrian Fernandez
- C-377/08 - EGN
- C-415/93 - Union royale belge des sociétés de football association and Others v Bosman and Others
- C-43/07 - Arens-Sikken
- C-443/06 - Hollmann
- C-510/08 - Mattner
- C-512/03 - Blanckaert
- C-562/07 - Commission v Spain
- C-97/09 - Schmelz
- C-10/14 - Miljoen
- C-132/10 - Halley
- C-25/11 - Varzim Sol
- C-342/10 - Commission v Finland
- C-417/10 - 3M Italia
- C-480/17 - Montag
- C-496/11 - Portugal Telecom
- C-500/10 - Belvedere Costruzioni
- C-559/13 - Grünewald
- C-578/10 - van Putten and Others
- C-600/10 - Commission v Germany
- C-641/17 - Canadian Pension Fund
Highlight in text
Go|
13.2.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 37/3 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 November 2009 — Ulrich Schröder v Finanzamt Hameln
(Case C-450/09)
2010/C 37/04
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ulrich Schröder
Defendant: Finanzamt Hameln
Question referred
The following question is referred, pursuant to Article 234(3) EC, for a preliminary ruling:
Is a situation where a relative with domestically limited tax liability, unlike a person with unlimited tax liability, may not deduct from his total income, as special expenditure, annuities paid in connection with income from letting or leasing, contrary to Articles 56 and 12 EC?