Available languages

• BG
• ES
• CS
• DA
• DE
• ET
• EL
• EN
• FR
• HR
• IT
• LV
• LT
• HU
• MT
• NL
• PL
• PT
• RO
• SK
• SL
• FI
• SV

Taxonomy tags

•  VAT formal - Liable for payment

•  VAT formal

Info

• Referral date: 19-10-2010
• Show case reference
• Opinion date: 17-11-2011
• Ruling date: 29-03-2012
• AG: Sharpston

References in this case

• C-132/06 - Commission v Italy

• C-415/93 - Union royale belge des sociétés de football association and Others v Bosman and Others

• C-450/09 - Schröder

References to this case

• C-132/06 - Commission v Italy

• C-415/93 - Union royale belge des sociétés de football association and Others v Bosman and Others

• C-450/09 - Schröder

• C-259/12 - Rodopi-M 91

• C-419/14 - WebMindLicenses

• C-546/14 - Degano Trasporti

• C-66/14 - Finanzamt Linz

Share

• Print
• Download PDF
• E-mail link
• Get text per e-mail

Highlight in text

EU tax law WEB Belvedere Costruzioni - C-500/10

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Centrale — Sezione di Bologna (Italy) lodged on 19 October 2010 — Ufficio IVA di Piacenza v Belvedere Costruzioni Srl

(Case C-500/10)

()

2010/C 346/59

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Centrale — Sezione di Bologna

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ufficio IVA di Piacenza

Defendant: Belvedere Costruzioni Srl

Question referred

Does Article 10 of the EC Treaty, now Article 4 of the Treaty on European Union, read in conjunction with Articles 2 and 22 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes, preclude [legislation such as] the legislation of the Italian State laid down in Article 3(2a) of Decree-Law No 40 of 25 March 2010, converted into Law No 73 of 22 May 2010, under which the court with jurisdiction in tax matters may not rule on the existence of an alleged tax debt which the Tax Authority has sought, in due time, to recover by appealing against an unfavourable decision and which thus in effect provides for the VAT debt at issue to be wholly waived in cases where the courts have ruled both at first instance and at the first level of appeal that such a debt does not exist, without the taxable person in favour of whom the waiver has operated having to pay even a fraction of the debt at issue?