BG
ES
CS
DA
DE
ET
EL
EN
FR
HR
IT
LV
LT
HU
MT
NL
PL
PT
RO
SK
SL
FI
SVInfo
- Referral date: 18-07-2011
- Show case reference
- Ruling date: 06-09-2012
- AG: Kokott
References in this case
- C-157/07 - Krankenheim Ruhesitz
- C-168/01 - Bosal
- C-204/90 - Bachmann
- C-253/09 - Commission v Hungary
- C-264/96 - ICI
- C-298/05 - Columbus Container Services
- C-300/90 - Commission v Belgium
- C-347/04 - Rewe Zentralfinanz
- C-371/10 - National Grid Indus
- C-38/10 - Commission v Portugal
- C-397/98 - Metallgesellschaft
- C-410/98 - Judgment - 08/03/2001 - Hoechst AG and Hoechst
- C-470/04 - N
- C-9/02 - De Lasteyrie
- C-96/08 - CIBA
References to this case
- C-157/07 - Krankenheim Ruhesitz
- C-168/01 - Bosal
- C-204/90 - Bachmann
- C-253/09 - Commission v Hungary
- C-264/96 - ICI
- C-298/05 - Columbus Container Services
- C-300/90 - Commission v Belgium
- C-347/04 - Rewe Zentralfinanz
- C-371/10 - National Grid Indus
- C-38/10 - Commission v Portugal
- C-397/98 - Metallgesellschaft
- C-410/98 - Judgment - 08/03/2001 - Hoechst AG and Hoechst
- C-470/04 - N
- C-9/02 - De Lasteyrie
- C-96/08 - CIBA
- C-342/10 - Commission v Finland
- C-375/12 - Bouanich
- C-38/10 - Commission v Portugal
- C-559/13 - Grünewald
- C-589/13 - F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt
- C-591/13 - Commission v Germany
- C-64/11 - Commission v Spain
- C-66/14 - Finanzamt Linz
- C-686/13 - X AB
Highlight in text
Go|
8.10.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 298/12 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 18 July 2011 — DI. VI. Finanziaria S.A.P.A. di Diego della Valle & C. v Administration des contributions directes
(Case C-380/11)
2011/C 298/23
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Tribunal administratif
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: DI. VI. Finanziaria S.A.P.A. di Diego della Valle & C.
Defendant: Administration des contributions directes
Question referred
Is Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as precluding a measure, such as that governed by Paragraph 8a of the Law on capital tax of 16 October 1934, as amended, subparagraph 1 of which makes the grant of a reduction in capital tax conditional upon remaining liable to Luxembourg capital tax for the next five tax years?