BG
ES
CS
DA
DE
ET
EL
EN
FR
HR
IT
LV
LT
HU
MT
NL
PL
PT
RO
SK
SL
FI
SVInfo
- Referral date: 17-10-2011
- Show case reference
- Ruling date: 18-10-2012
- AG: Bot
References in this case
References to this case
- C-107/10 - Enel Maritsa Iztok 3
- C-142/11 - Dávid
- C-25/07 - Sosnowska
- C-274/10 - Commission v Hungary
- C-284/11 - EMS-Bulgaria Transport
- C-338/11 - Santander
- C-594/10 - van Laarhoven
- C-78/00 - Commission v Italy
- C-80/11 - Mahagében and Dávid
- C-487/20 - Philips Orăştie
- C-527/11 - Ablessio
- C-597/17 - Belgisch Syndicaat van Chiropraxie and Others
Highlight in text
Go|
7.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 6/7 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 17 October 2011 — SIA Mednis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
(Case C-525/11)
2012/C 6/08
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Augstākās tiesas Senāts
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: SIA Mednis
Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
Question referred
Does Article 183 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax give a Member State the right, without carrying out any specific analysis and solely on the basis of an arithmetical calculation, not to refund that part of the excess tax that is over 18 % (the standard rate of VAT) of the total value of the taxable transactions carried out in the corresponding monthly tax periods until the State tax authority has received the annual return of the person subject to value added tax?
(1) OJ 2006 L 347, p 1.