Available languages

• BG
• ES
• CS
• DA
• DE
• ET
• EL
• EN
• FR
• HR
• IT
• LV
• LT
• HU
• MT
• NL
• PL
• PT
• RO
• SK
• SL
• FI
• SV

Taxonomy tags

•  Procedural Law (EU\/ECHR)

Info

• Referral date: 10-11-2011
• Show case reference
• Opinion date: 13-12-2012
• Ruling date: 18-04-2013
• AG: Wathelet

References in this case

• C-397/98 - Metallgesellschaft

• C-410/98 - Judgment - 08/03/2001 - Hoechst AG and Hoechst

• C-446/04 - Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation

• C-524/04 - Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation

• C-591/10 - Littlewoods Retail and Others

Share

• Print
• Download PDF
• E-mail link
• Get text per e-mail

Highlight in text

EU tax law WEB Irimie - C-565/11

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Sibiu (Romania) lodged on 10 November 2011 — Mariana Irimie v Administrația Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

(Case C-565/11)

2012/C 25/66

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mariana Irimie

Defendants: Administrația Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

Question referred

Can the principle of the effectiveness, equivalence and proportionality of remedies in relation to infringements of Community law to which individuals are subjected as the result of the application of legislation which does not conform to Community law arising from the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the right to property laid down in Article 6 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be regarded as precluding provisions of national law which limit the amount of damage which could be recovered by an individual who has suffered an infringement of his rights?