BG
ES
CS
DA
DE
ET
EL
EN
FR
HR
IT
LV
LT
HU
MT
NL
PL
PT
RO
SK
SL
FI
SVInfo
- Referral date: 26-06-2009
- Show case reference
- Ruling date: 01-07-2010
- AG: Mengozzi
References in this case
- C-155/08 - X u Passenheim-van Schoot
- C-157/05 - Holböck
- C-157/08 - Sentenza - 11/06/2009 - Passenheim-van Schoot
- C-170/05 - Denkavit Internationaal u Denkavit France
- C-182/08 - Glaxo Wellcome
- C-204/90 - Bachmann
- C-282/07 - Truck Center
- C-290/04 - Scorpio
- C-319/02 - Manninen
- C-34/98 - Il-Kummissjoni vs Franza
- C-35/98 - Verkooijen
- C-374/04 - Test Claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation
- C-379/05 - Amurta
- C-418/07 - Papillon
- C-436/06 - Grønfeldt
- C-446/04 - Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation
- C-452/04 - Fidium Finanz
- C-478/98 - Commission/Belgium
- C-540/07 - Commission/Italy
- C-9/02 - De Lasteyrie
References to this case
- C-155/08 - X u Passenheim-van Schoot
- C-157/05 - Holböck
- C-157/08 - Sentenza - 11/06/2009 - Passenheim-van Schoot
- C-170/05 - Denkavit Internationaal u Denkavit France
- C-182/08 - Glaxo Wellcome
- C-204/90 - Bachmann
- C-282/07 - Truck Center
- C-290/04 - Scorpio
- C-319/02 - Manninen
- C-34/98 - Il-Kummissjoni vs Franza
- C-35/98 - Verkooijen
- C-374/04 - Test Claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation
- C-379/05 - Amurta
- C-418/07 - Papillon
- C-436/06 - Grønfeldt
- C-446/04 - Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation
- C-452/04 - Fidium Finanz
- C-478/98 - Commission/Belgium
- C-540/07 - Commission/Italy
- C-9/02 - De Lasteyrie
- C-18/15 - Brisal
- C-20/16 - Bechtel
- C-284/09 - Commission v Germany
- C-300/15 - Kohll u Kohll-Schlesser
- C-318/10 - SIAT
- C-387/11 - Commission v Belgium
- C-48/15 - ING International
- C-493/09 - Commission v Portugal
- C-498/10 - Feijenoord
- C-544/11 - Petersen
- C-560/13 - Wagner-Raith
- C-589/13 - F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt
- C-589/14 - Il-Kummissjoni vs Il-Belġju
- C-97/09 - Schmelz
Highlight in text
Go|
12.9.2009 |
MT |
Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea |
C 220/20 |
Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mill-Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (il-Belġju) fis-26 ta’ Ġunju 2009 — G.A. Dijkman u M.A. Dijkman-Lavaleije vs Belgische Staat
(Kawża C-233/09)
2009/C 220/38
Lingwa tal-kawża: L-Olandiż
Qorti tar-rinviju
Hof van beroep te Antwerpen
Partijiet fil-kawża prinċipali
Rikorrenti: Gerhard Dijkman u Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije
Konvenut: Belgische Staat
Domanda preliminari
Il-fatt li residenti Belġjani li jwettqu investimenti jew jiddepożitaw flus barra mill-pajjiż, pereżempju fl-Olanda, sabiex jevitaw li jħallsu t-taxxa muniċipali addizzjonali prevista bl-Artikolu 465 WIB92, jiġu obbligati jużaw is-servizzi ta’ intermedjarju Belġjan sabiex jiksbu l-ħlas tad-dħul min proprjetà mobbli filwaqt li r-residenti li jwettqu investimenti jew jiddepożitaw flus fil-Belġju dejjem jistgħu jibbenefikaw mis-sistema ta’ ħlas minn ras il-għajn fuq proprjetà mobbli liberatorju stabbilita bl-Artikolu 313 WIB 92 u b’dan il-mod li jistgħu jevitaw it-taxxa muniċipali addizzjonali prevista bl-Artikolu 465 WIB92 minħabba li l-ħlas bil-quddiem fuq proprjetà mobbili diġa seħħ f’ras il-għajn, jikkostitwixxi ksur tal-Artikolu 56(1) KE?